Did horse feet evolve for endurance travel at the trot rather than speed at the gallop?

Fight or flight. Run or be eaten. We were all taught that horses evolved to have single toes because they were the prey of predators. A single hoof made them one of the fastest animals on earth. The successful survivors were the fastest ones, because they could outrun lions and tigers and bears. But a new group of researchers published an alternate point of view on April 12, which we share thanks to the University of Bristol in England. According to the authors, they weave "together information from equid evolutionary history, foot anatomy, and locomotion, which provide the essential background information that informs our novel proposition". They suggest that horses' feet evolved for efficient trotting during grazing, rather than for speed to evade predators. But isn't it possible that the single toe aided both survival gaits?

Palaeobiologists from the University of Bristol (UK) and Howard University (USA) have uncovered new evidence that suggests that horses’ legs have adapted over time to be optimized for endurance travel at the trot, rather than speed at the gallop.

Earlier ancestors of horses (including asses and zebras) had three toes on each foot. Because only single-toed (monodactyl) forms survive today, this anatomy has been perceived as a superior evolutionary outcome, enabling horses to outrun predators.

But the new interpretation of equine evolution may be biased by our own history with horses. Performance at the racetrack has been less important for human history than the endurance of horses at slower speeds, and such endurance may have been the critical factor in horse evolution.

The research team combined evidence from the fossil record with existing studies on horse locomotion and propose that the adaptive significance of single-toed limbs was for trotting during roaming for food and water, rather than for galloping to avoid carnivores.

The real evolutionary ‘step forward’ in horse foot anatomy was not the loss of additional toes, but the evolution of the ‘spring foot’.

This pogo-stick type of foot anatomy evolved in the three-toed distant ancestors of modern horses, which sported an enlarged central toe but retained small ‘side toes’, which likely prevented the foot from over-extending during extreme locomotor performance.

The ‘spring foot’ enables the storage of elastic energy in the limb tendons during locomotion, and its evolution coincided with the spread of grasslands around 20 million years ago in North America (the original home of horse evolution).

The spring-footed horses radiated extensively and were as diverse during their time as antelopes in Africa today.

By around 11 million years ago, they also spread into Eurasia and Africa, where they eventually included forms larger than a modern horse. But only the lineage leading to modern horses, one amongst many, showed any tendency to reduce the number of toes.

If being single-toed was evolutionary advantageous, why did the majority of horses retain the three-toed condition for most of their evolutionary history?

Professor Christine Janis, lead author from the University of Bristol’s School of Earth Sciences (and also affiliated with Brown University in the USA) said: “Early members of the single-toed horse lineage were not only losing their side toes, but the bones of the remaining central toe showed evidence of the boosting-up of the ‘spring foot’ apparatus, implying that these horses were becoming more reliant on energy-efficient locomotion.

“But at the same time these horses’ backs were becoming shorter and stiffer, contraindicative of adaptation for the back-flexing fast galloping gait. Rather, the preferred locomotion was more likely the medium-speed trot.”

The authors propose that the early single-toed horses were changing their daily foraging behavior to roam more widely in search of food, promoting energy-saving adaptations in their feet.

The loss of the side toes may simply have been a consequence of upgrading the anatomy of the main, central toe, and with the boosted-up ligament system their original function was no longer necessary.

Single-toed horses appeared in North America around 12 million years ago. Over the next few million years, they radiated alongside three-toed horses but remained pony-sized and were neither diverse nor numerous.

But at this time the climate in northern latitudes was becoming cooler and drier. An increase in roaming behavior would promote selection for the energy-efficient single-toed foot.

At the time, the foraging behavior of the single-toed horses would have been one adaptive strategy among an equine diversity, much as different kinds of antelope have different modes of foraging today.

But by around five million years ago, the cooling and drying trend became more intense worldwide; the former great diversity of three-toed horses had dwindled, and the direct ancestor of modern horses (early species of the genus Equus) appeared. By a million years ago, all lineages of three-toed horses were extinct.

Why were single-toed horses the only equine lineage to survive to the present day? It is unlikely that competition was involved between the differently-adapted equines, as the Old World three-toed horses started their decline several million years before Equus emigrated from North America to join them 2.5 million years ago. More likely, the climatic changes of the late Cenozoic favored the evolutionary strategy of the single-toed horses.

Professor Ray Bernor, the co-author of the paper, from Howard University’s College of Medicine, notes that the single-toed horses really just got a lucky break due to changing climates.

He added: “The three-toed horses, especially the Old World hipparions, were an incredibly successful radiation, and their skeletons showed adaptations for leaping and springing as well as running. But they evolved for a world that was warmer and wetter than that of today, and like many other large mammals did not survive to the present day”

Single-toed horses became the dominant equines across the world in the past couple of million years, and only went extinct in the Americas at the end of the Pleistocene, around 12,000 years ago.

Professor Janis added: “However, nobody could have foreseen this eventual success ten million years ago, when single-toed horses were merely a minor lineage among equines, confined to North America.

“Their foot anatomy was ultimately important for finding food, rather than for avoiding becoming food themselves.”

• • • • •

Read the Open Access (free to read) article in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution:

Janis, C. M., & Bernor, R. (2019). The Evolution of Equid Monodactyly: A Review including a New Hypothesis. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 7, 119.

Top photo: Public domain background image of harness racing on the beach.

Are you interested in research? Subscribe today to receive HoofSearch, the monthly index of newly published, peer-reviewed papers, proceedings and patents related to the horse's foot and lameness. Click here to subscribe or click here to learn more about HoofSearch.

© Fran Jurga and Hoofcare Publishing; Fran Jurga's Hoof Blog is the news service for Hoofcare and Lameness Publishing. Please, no re-use of text or images on other sites or social media without permission--please link instead. (Please ask if you need help.) The Hoof Blog may be read online at the blog page, checked via RSS feed, or received via a headlines-link email (requires signup in box at top right of blog page). Use the little envelope symbol below to email this article to others. The "translator" tool in the right sidebar will convert this article (roughly) to the language of your choice. To share this article on Facebook and other social media, click on the small symbols below the labels. Be sure to "like" the Hoofcare and Lameness Facebook page and click on "get notifications" under the page's "like" button to keep up with the hoof news on Facebook. Questions or problems with the Hoof Blog? Click here to send an email hoofblog@gmail.com.  

Follow Hoofcare + Lameness on Twitter: @HoofBlog

Read this blog's headlines on the Hoofcare + Lameness Facebook Page

 

Disclosure of Material Connection: The Hoof Blog (Hoofcare Publishing) has not received any direct compensation for writing this post. Hoofcare Publishing has no material connection to the brands, products, or services mentioned, other than products and services of Hoofcare Publishing. I am disclosing this in accordance with the Federal Trade Commission’s 16 CFR, Part 255: Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising.